July 25, 2007...4:16 pm
Project Management is Bollocks!
If there’s one thing I’ve learned in my 10+ years working in IT, it’s this: Project Management is utter bollocks. It’s rubbish. I’m not saying that planning is a bad idea. I thinking planning is absolutely necessary if you want to avoid disaster. But anyone who thinks they can predict exactly what will happen over the life of a project, exactly how much it will cost and how long it will take is some bizarre hybrid of a lunatic and a liar.
The most polite description I can think of for the bullshit that surrounds project management is that it’s a consensual hallucination. I first came across that term in the cyberpunk’s bible, William Gibson’s SF novel “Neuromancer”. He used the term to describe cyberspace. I don’t know if he invented either term (consensual hallucination or cyberspace) but he was certainly pivotal in popularising them.
Cyberspace doesn’t exist in any physical sense in the world of Neuromancer. It’s a massive computer network that can be “navigated” in a way that people can conceptualise. Which allows for some cool descriptions of pseudo-physical interactions with data. For ease of understanding, everyone treats this abstract concept as a concrete reality. They have consented to believe in the hallucination because it’s easier to understand that way.
Life is full of consensual hallucinations. A polite way of saying we’re surrounded by bullshit. If you live in a democracy, you tend to believe you have a say in what happens in your life. There’s a tendency to ignore the reality of politicians being soulless whores who are bought and paid for by vested interests. The consensual hallucination of participatory democracy is more comforting. Voting is little more than a sideshow but life’s a little easier to bear if we pretend voting can actually change anything.
In fact, pretty much any political or religious belief system is a consensual hallucination. Which is not to say that they are by definition untrue. Believe in your magic friend in the sky all you like. Who needs empirical evidence when banding together with other believers makes the consensual hallucination feel true?
And don’t get me started on science. I’m a big believer in science, but that’s the point. I’m a believer, by and large, not a knower. At least 98% of people who believe in science can’t prove or even deeply understand much of the science they support. But we put our faith in the idea that someone smarter than us got it right.
Which gets me back to project management, specifically, how it applies in the world of IT. The consensual hallucination that permeates nearly all of IT is that the magic pixie dust of project management can reveal The Truth. People who like to think they are rational individuals tend to believe that it’s possible to predict ahead of time how long a project would take, how much it will cost and everything that will happen along the way.
In the broadest possible sense, this is true. If you have enough experience you can probably do better than a wild-arsed guess. We’ve done something similar that took about this long so we can aim to do that again. That’s logical. IT people like logical. But when someone gets the project management religion, they think they can be precise. Business people like precise. But some people are completely fucking insane when it comes to this topic.
Some people believe Project Management should tell you these things down to the day and the dollar. A project plan should tell you every task that needs to be completed. A project plan should be flawless and leave nothing to chance. And a project plan should be completed before ANY work is done on the project.
OK, take a fucking pill, man. That is straight up insanity. Despite the fact this is clearly fucked-up thinking, it’s a terrifyingly common mindset in management ranks. Planning, or at least goal setting, at some level is obviously important. How the hell do you know what you’re doing if you don’t have any targets?
But we’ve descended into the seventh circle of hell when we move from “let’s have a clearly defined set of project goals and a strategy for how we’ll get there” to “this is 100% accurate, it’s carved in stone and will never change, if you can’t deliver according to this project plan it’s because you’re doing something wrong.”
Here’s what I think are the main drivers for elevating the myth of project management to the level of holy scripture:
- There’s a whole industry of consultants scamming a living out of it. They base their entire existence on the lie that they can provide the definitive solution to project management. They aren’t about to ruin a good thing by telling the truth about their fallibility.
- There are several rainforests worth of books published on the topic. They all apparently have the definitive answer as well. How could they possibly be wrong? You know, unless publishing all those books was a money making scam.
- Nobody likes to look stupid. If you’re a professional and someone puts you on the spot to answer “how long will this take?” it’s only human to want to provide an answer. Whether you call it professional pride or ego, it’s a powerful driver.
- Programming tasks are measurable in retrospect. It’s easy to make the mistake of thinking this makes them easy to predict in advance. Being able to say “for a previous project we wrote this many lines of code and it took this many hours” does not mean you can accurately say “for this completely new project we will write this many lines of code and it will take this long.”
- Very few businesses are keen to hand over an open chequebook. Because a manager demands a deadline someone provides one. Just because this stupidity keeps happening over and over doesn’t make it less stupid.
So how do we escape the consensual hallucination that there is a way to do project management that is absolutely foolproof and provides definitive answers? Well, I propose we kill all the consultants. Just throw the fuckers up against the wall and shoot them. OK, maybe I won’t get away with that. How about we tone it down a bit. Maybe we’ll just take it out on the consultants who act like they have some mystical powers that enable them to succeed where all others have failed. We could staple their tongues to their chins.
Maybe even that’s going a little too far. Surely there’s a solution that doesn’t involve jail time? There is no silver bullet that will solve this issue (although there’s quite a good essay entitled “No Silver Bullet“) . But there are things that can be done to improve the situation.
How about we all sit down to a big three-course serving of reality? This can save many packed lunches of pain and misery. If you’re on the IT side, have the courage to say “I don’t know” when that’s an accurate answer. And if you’re on the business side, FOR GOD’S SAKE, LISTEN! Good IT workers really don’t like saying “I don’t know.” If they say it, they probably mean it. So stop pushing for a definitive answer when one doesn’t exist.
I’ve spent years dealing with obnoxious managers who want an answer, any answer. They make it clear that they think the lack of an answer comes from laziness or evasiveness. Worse still, managers often insist on being given an answer even when they know the answer is wrong. That isn’t being hard-nosed, it’s being fucking stupid.
It’s perfectly reasonable to want some sort of plan up front. I’m actually one of those funny types who believe up front planning is a necessity. So long as everyone understands an estimate is just that: an estimate. You learn as you go along and discover more detail. So you revise the estimate accordingly. For this to work, everyone involved has to listen, everyone has to be open, everyone has to be responsive.
Or we could keep flailing away with the fucked up attitude that “it has to be this way” because the sacred project plan says it’s this way. Because that really is a lot of fun, isn’t it?
At the end of the day, it’s how people respond to the unexpected that drives whether a project will succeed or fail. So what are you going to be? A jerk who worships at the altar of whatever project management methodology is flavour of the month? Or a realist who can accept that things change and all projects can be unpredictable? Your decision makes a big difference.
27 Comments
July 25, 2007 at 8:58 pm
Great post, much more entertaining than “The Myth of Project Management.”
http://weblog.raganwald.com/2007/06/which-theory-first-evidence.html
July 25, 2007 at 10:35 pm
i dont like exessive planning since that has a bad habit of going awry. so i prefer the concept of what do we need, how do we do it and how do we fix it, if it doesnt work.
July 25, 2007 at 11:14 pm
Priceless. I might have to print a t-shirt with some of this on it and wear it around the office.
July 26, 2007 at 12:39 am
Who was it who said “Plans are worthless, planning is invaluable.”
I think it was someone like George Washington, but my knowledge of quotable american revolutionaries is a bit lacking.
July 26, 2007 at 12:56 am
Good article, but don’t kill me off yet. I happen to be one those project managers who say “I don’t know.” However, I follow up on questions and if I find the answer I let the business unit know. If I can’t, I provide alternatives for discussion. I’ve always had a good rapport with business unit management and IT management because I didn’t make things up and was honest. Not always what they wanted to hear.
July 26, 2007 at 2:33 am
“Plans are worthless, planning is indispensable.”
— Eisenhower
July 26, 2007 at 2:59 am
Ha ha ha!
I’m so glad I’m not the only one thinking this!
I do think it’s worth elaborating Sandra’s point. Some people see the word “management” as a synonym to “control”; such people are boneheads.
Others see “management” as an activity to make the working lives of others smoother; I have a lot of time for such people.
A project manager can do some very useful things. The most important for me is to act as a shit filter; that is, to stop the customer shit which blasts through the fan from hitting the programmers. Then there are things that programmers need done to get work done and a good PM handles these things. Furthermore, a good PM at least keeps tabs on what has been done and what hasn’t and also what can potentially fuck up a project.
So proper project management shouldn’t be about making schedule promises in the face of uncertainty, but rather about doing all the crap to help programmers do what they do best: program.
July 26, 2007 at 4:10 am
My ex always complained about the PM’s at Lucent. I believe he said “a deaf, dumb, blind monkey with it’s thumb up its butt could do a better job than these Asshats.”
But then, they’re Union workers so they have the luxury of jerking off on the job.
I hate being a Project Manager because you have to rely on other people to do their jobs and more often than not they let me down. Bleh!
July 26, 2007 at 5:09 am
Yeah, its a bunch of BS. So is the PMP (pmi.org).
July 26, 2007 at 8:23 am
I liked the other version better - it was far more lucid.
(That being said, this one was more enjoyable :))
July 26, 2007 at 8:48 am
Reg: thanks, I thought I’d spice it up a bit
Shadow: I’m with you!
Jim: let me know how that works out for you
Some pics would be good!
Massif: it’s a good summary, whoever said it first.
Sandra: I’m not down on project managers per se, just anyone who insists that a plan is a flawlessly accurate view of the future rather than, you know, a plan.
Steve: thanks for clearing that up!
Wynand: I absolutely agree that a good manager is invaluable. I’ve written extensively on my views on good bosses vs bad bosses in the past.
Cinnkitty: A big bureaucracy like Lucent would be a nightmare. And I agree with you about relying on others being stressful.
Arsenalist: I think it’s no coincidence that acronym makes them look like pimps
Rodeo: I can write for more than one audience
July 26, 2007 at 9:58 am
[...] Project Management is Bollocks! If there’s one thing I’ve learned in my 10+ years working in IT, it’s this: Project Management is […] [...]
July 26, 2007 at 10:29 am
Manager: “I need an estimate”
Worker: [submits estimate based on best-case + contingency]
Manager: “Really? But it’s only [...]”
Worker: [under pressure, drops contingency and submits estimate full of "if"s]
Manager: “Great, let’s get started”
Worker: [works hard to try and meet the estimate, and absorbs contingency himself]
And the worker is automatically on the defensive if it goes over the estimate. Manager magnanimously says “that’s OK” and updates project schedules for everyone - heap the guilt on while staying on worker’s side.
Yep, sounds like effective management, in a world where stress and burnout are Somebody Else’s Promlem[tm].
July 26, 2007 at 12:19 pm
> although there’s quite a good essay entitled “No Silver Bullet“
The problem is, nobody read that.
Some years ago I had been trying to confront a “manager” who had been trying to force some “furniture police” upon me.
Me: “This is utterly meaningless. They wrote about it in “Peopleware”, like, 50 years ago!”
Manager: “WHO wrote WHERE?”
Me: “You didn’t read “Peopleware”? How are you managing, then? Go read it already!”
Manager: “I have no time! There’s much to manage!”
July 26, 2007 at 12:38 pm
Thanks for the post. They chose to have me as a project manager in one of my past lives. If I had had your post then, it would have saved so much time. I thought it was just me losing my mind.
July 26, 2007 at 2:14 pm
Niq: That’s the problem summed up right there. I’ve seen that so mnay times it isn’t funny.
Vlad: It is scary when managers don’t have a clue about how to manage.
Lisa: nope, not losing your mind, things around you were crazy!
July 27, 2007 at 7:37 am
I can’t wait to get into management consulting, that’s where all the real chedda’ is. For now I’ll bide my time in software. I’ll know it’s time to make the move when I can’t hack it anymore. My philosophy is, if you aren’t be part of the solution, make money off the problem.
@Wynand Winterbach: I can tell you’re a great PM, though likely under appreciated by senior management. You echo the words of the finest managers I’ve worked with. (The very words “shit filter”, to be exact.)
July 27, 2007 at 9:16 am
You’re right there Brian, consulting is the promised land of lots of money for no work.
July 27, 2007 at 12:38 pm
>Just throw the fuckers up against the wall and shoot them. OK, maybe I won’t get away with that.
If you throw them against that wall hard enough, you wouldn’t have to shoot. (Sorry, can’t refrain from thinking that it’s a cute idea. :))
July 27, 2007 at 1:07 pm
But I’m such a fan of the old line “You’ll be first against the wall when the revolution comes”
July 27, 2007 at 5:46 pm
The first against the wall will be people the revolutionaries have grudges against.
July 28, 2007 at 8:24 am
[...] Finally, the Angry Aussie gives his take on Project Management. A highly entertaining and humourous read, from a highly entertaining and humourous [...]
July 31, 2007 at 4:46 pm
This is a great article. Should be published on PMI site. All budding and would be managers or(damagers) should read it at the start.
Good work
August 30, 2007 at 2:23 pm
[...] Project Management is Bollocks! « Angry 365 Days a Year (tags: management projectmanagement) [...]
January 15, 2008 at 8:21 pm
[...] Filed under: Programming, Software — dorai @ 3:21 am Why does this strike a chord? This frankly brutal post on myths of Project Management is much more than that: Life is full of consensual hallucinations. A polite way of saying we’re [...]
January 26, 2008 at 2:48 pm
I believe the IT Project Management jobs are mostly BS/CYA roles. I am yet to see competency in this field. For some reason, I tend to think of them as secretaries and I call them to meetings just so they can take down notes and schedule follow-up meetings, and do a little bit of call-coordination. I do not expect them to contribute anything product to my projects other than the administrative/secretarial work. The fallacy that “Technical guys cannot communicate” is the reason for these jobs..and do not even get me started on another one that says “Technical guys cannot understand business”.
April 10, 2008 at 4:22 pm
Leave a Reply